Author Archive
U um bombaša samoubojice
Thursday, September 9th, 2010Christopher Hitchens: Sučeljavanje sa kršćanskom “poniznošću”
Wednesday, September 8th, 2010Neil deGrasse Tyson: Viđenja NLO-a
Wednesday, September 8th, 2010BBC o kamenovanju
Tuesday, September 7th, 2010AC 360: Fokus na obitelji
Tuesday, September 7th, 2010Stephen Hawking: Bog nije stvorio svemir
Monday, September 6th, 2010Inedx prenosi vijest o novoj knjizi Stephena Hawkinga u kojoj on piše o tome da za postojanje svemira nije bilo potrebe za Bogom:
GENIJALNI um našega vremena, profesor Stephen Hawking, izjavio je kako nema mjesta Bogu u teorijama o nastanku svemira.
Ranije je Hawking izražavao mišljenje da je postojanje Boga spojivo sa znanošću, no u najnovijoj knjizi opovrgava sam sebe i zaključuje kako je “Veliki prasak” bio neizbježna posljedica zakona prirode.
“Zbog zakonitosti poput gravitacije, svemir može i bit će stvoren ni iz čega. Spontano stvaranje jer je razlog zbog kojega ima nečega umjesto ničega, zašto postoji Svemir i zašto mi postojimo”, kazao je Hawking u intervjuu Timesu. Hawkingu će ubrzo izaći nova knjiga “The Grand Design” gdje će objasniti zašto Bog nema mjesta u nastanku Svemira.
Stephen Hawking: Fizika je dovoljna
Saturday, September 4th, 2010Cristopher Hitchens: Molitve na koje nema odgovora
Saturday, September 4th, 2010Cristopher Hitchens je za Vanity Fair napisao drugi u nizu članaka o svojoj bolesti i o reakcijama ljudi oko njega:
What?s an atheist to think when thousands of believers (including prominent rabbis and priests) are praying for his survival and salvation?while others believe his cancer was divinely inspired, and hope that he burns in hell?
When I described the tumor in my esophagus as a ?blind, emotionless alien,? I suppose that even I couldn?t help awarding it some of the qualities of a living thing. This at least I know to be a mistake: an instance of the ?pathetic fallacy? (angry cloud, proud mountain, presumptuous little Beaujolais) by which we ascribe animate qualities to inanimate phenomena. To exist, a cancer needs a living organism, but it cannot ever become a living organism. Its whole malice?there I go again?lies in the fact that the ?best? it can do is to die with its host. Either that or its host will find the measures with which to extirpate and outlive it.
But, as I knew before I became ill, there are some people for whom this explanation is unsatisfying. To them, a rodent carcinoma really is a dedicated, conscious agent?a slow-acting suicide-murderer?on a consecrated mission from heaven. You haven?t lived, if I can put it like this, until you have read contributions such as this on the Web sites of the faithful:
Who else feels Christopher Hitchens getting terminal throat cancer [sic] was God?s revenge for him using his voice to blaspheme him? Atheists like to ignore FACTS. They like to act like everything is a ?coincidence?. Really? It?s just a ?coincidence? [that] out of any part of his body, Christopher Hitchens got cancer in the one part of his body he used for blasphemy? Yea, keep believing that Atheists. He?s going to writhe in agony and pain and wither away to nothing and then die a horrible agonizing death, and THEN comes the real fun, when he?s sent to HELLFIRE forever to be tortured and set afire.




